Astro

Learn · Stellar evolution

Star clusters — birth certificates with an expiry date

Stars are born in packs — that was the point of the star formation article. This one is about what becomes of the packs. The short answer: they are the most valuable measuring instruments in stellar physics, because a cluster is a laboratory with controlled conditions — and it wears its age openly, if you know where to look.

Why clusters are laboratories

All the stars in a cluster formed from the same cloud: same distance, same age, same chemical makeup. What differs is exactly one quantity — mass. A cluster is therefore the experiment that nature set up for the stellar life paths article: the same starting line, only the one dial varied. And because massive stars die first, a cluster's main sequence is cleared away from the top down — how far, that is a clock:

Schematic color–magnitude diagram of three star clusters: in the young cluster the main sequence is fully populated, in the middle-aged one the bright blue stars are already missing, and in the old one the populated sequence turns off lower still. The turnoff point reveals the age.turnoff point = age→ giant branchyoung · 10 Myr — all still on the main sequencemiddle-aged · 600 Myr — the bright ones are already giantsold · 10 Gyr — only the frugal ones leftluminosity (log)← hot and blue · cool and red →
The turnoff point: where the populated main sequence ends and bends into the giant branch, the age of the cluster is written. It was exactly this method that dated the globular clusters to some twelve billion years — for a long time the best lower bound on the age of the universe.

Two families, two fates

The open clusters of the disk — everything this gallery shows — are loose assemblies of hundreds to thousands of stars. They do not last forever: close encounters inside and the tides of the Milky Way pluck out star after star, until after a few hundred million years only field stars are left — unless the cluster is massive enough to sit it out: King 9 in the field of the Lion Nebula is about three billion years old and still a cluster. The globular clusters of the halo are another league: hundreds of thousands of stars, densely packed, bound since the early days of the Galaxy.

Two cluster fates: an open cluster is born out of the gas, blown clear, and after a few hundred million years dissolved by the tides of the Milky Way. A globular cluster has stayed bound for some twelve billion years.open clusterembeddedin the gas of its birth cloudblown clearopen in the sky, like the Pleiadesdissolvedafter a few hundred Myr: field starsglobular clusterbound for ~12 billion yearstoo massive and too dense to dissolve — some 150 of them in the halo of the Milky WayThe Sun ran through the top row itself — its birth cluster has long since been scattered across the Galaxy.
Above, the fate of the open clusters; below, the permanence of the globular clusters. An M 13 portrait for the lower row is still on this gallery's shot list — the upper row can be documented entirely from our own material.

A few things worth knowing about this:

  • The Pleiades are the object lesson. The best-known open cluster stands plainly visible in the sky every winter evening: about 100 million years old, long since parted from its birth gas. The “Seven Sisters” are stage two of the diagram, with the naked eye.
  • Clusters have sibling chains too. The Double Cluster h and χ Persei — circumpolar from Friedrichsdorf — is a pair of nearly coeval clusters from the same cloud region: star formation produces not only stars in packs, but packs within packs.
  • Dissolved does not mean without a trace. The stars of the Ursa Major moving group — among them most of the Big Dipper stars — travel together through the solar neighborhood as the loose debris field of a former cluster. Even addresses without a cluster still betray a common birth, through motion and chemistry.
  • The Sun is a cluster orphan. Born 4.6 billion years ago in a pack, today traveling alone — its siblings are scattered across half the Galaxy. The search for them via chemical fingerprints is an active field of research.
AI-generated illustration: on the left a young, loose open star cluster of blue-white stars with remnants of nebulosity, on the right a dense, golden globular cluster of tens of thousands of old stars.

The two families face to face: young, blue, loose and still in its birth gas — against old, golden, dense and swept clean. Color balance and gas content tell the same story as the turnoff point. This image is AI-generated — not a photograph, but an illustration.

In our own sky

The gallery covers the open family in every phase of life:

M 45 · Pleiades — seven sisters in dust that is not theirs11 objects — show
The textbook specimen in person: the Pleiades are the “blown clear” stage from the diagram — about 100 million years old, long since parted from their birth gas. The blue veils are not a remnant of the nursery but a foreign dust cloud the cluster happens to be passing through. Taken in 2016, in this gallery's Newtonian era.My photograph · M45 · view gallery entry
HD 206267 and Trumpler 37 — the engine of the nebula5 objects — show
Stage one, embedded: Trumpler 37 is only a few million years old and still sits in the middle of its birth cloud, which it is busy taking apart itself with HD 206267 in the lead. Cluster and nebula are still a single object here.My photograph · IC1396A · 54.5′ × 52.6′ · view gallery entry
Melotte 15 · the cluster in the cleared-out center of W42 objects — show
Melotte 15, likewise very young: the cluster has already swept the center of the Heart Nebula clear, but still visibly clings to the remains of its cloud. The transition from stage one to stage two, photographed in mid-course.My photograph · IC 1805 · 52.9′ × 40.8′ · view gallery entry
NGC 7235: the young cluster in the corner
NGC 7235 on the edge of the Lion Nebula: about twelve million years old, some 1,500 solar masses, at a similar distance to the nebula — and probably a child of the same wave of star formation. Already blown clear, but still within sight of its origin.My photograph · NGC 7226 · 9.7′ × 11.8′ · view gallery entry
NGC 6910 — a young cluster against a red background1 object — show
NGC 6910, almost done being blown clear: a compact young cluster whose red surroundings are already scenery rather than nursery. In a few million years nothing here will recall the birth cloud.My photograph · IC 1318 Panorama · 16.7′ × 14.3′ · view gallery entry
NGC 1027 and the northeastern front · a foreground cluster over a young W4 rim1 object — show

NGC 1027, the mature stage: gas-free, a calmer color balance, and connected to the young W4 rim behind it in projection only (see the projection article). Exactly the type of cluster whose turnoff point could be read off cleanly.

My photograph · IC 1805 · 1.05° × 0.74° · view gallery entry
NGC 7245 and King 9: neighbors only in projection2 objects — show

Two clusters, one crop — and three kiloparsecs between them: NGC 7245 in the center is about 400 million years old, King 9 below and to the left about three billion. King 9 stands twice as far away; the neighborhood is pure projection. That the residual color in the dual band still hints at the age difference is the turnoff point in its crudest form.

My photograph · NGC 7226 · 39.4′ × 25.2′ · view gallery entry
NGC 7226: the namesake at the edge1 object — show
And the field's namesake itself: NGC 7226, a compact cluster of middling age — just under half a billion years, without a trace of gas, probably behind the nebula. With NGC 7235 in the other corner of the frame, a twelve-million-year-old cluster thus stands beside one forty times older.My photograph · NGC 7226 · 26.5′ × 13.6′ · view gallery entry
NGC 206 and the southwestern arm — a stellar workshop and its neighborhood6 objects — show
And the upper limit of the genus: NGC 206 in M 31 is no longer a bound cluster but a stellar association — hundreds of young blue stars, spread too loosely to hold together. Such associations dissolve almost immediately; we catch them only because their stars are so brightly short-lived.My photograph · M 31 · 51.2′ × 32.7′ · view gallery entry

Further reading

← All articles