Astro

Learn · Other galaxies

Galaxy encounters — when gravity reshapes

Two galaxies influence each other long before their bright disks touch — their dark-matter halos reach ten times further than the visible light. What happens then is decided by mass ratio, orbit and gas content, not by the distance two patches of light happen to have in a photograph.

Tides: the force difference shapes the form

The gravity of a neighbouring galaxy pulls on everything, but not equally everywhere. The side of a disk facing it is pulled harder than the centre, the far side less. What deforms the disk is not the attraction itself but this difference — the tidal force, the same one that raises two tidal bulges on Earth, one towards the Moon and one away from it. In galaxies two corresponding outgrowths form: a bridge of stars and gas towards the partner and a long tidal tail on the opposite side. Because the tidal force falls off with the cube of the distance, it acts almost only during close passages — and then all the more violently. That such tails really arise from simple gravity was shown by Alar and Jüri Toomre in 1972 with the first computer simulations, which needed only a few hundred test particles to reproduce the observed shapes. Toomre & Toomre (1972): Galactic Bridges and Tails

Tidal forces in a galaxy encounter: a large disk galaxy on the left, a smaller companion on the right. The side facing the partner is pulled harder than the centre, the far side less. The difference stretches the disk: a bridge forms towards the partner, a long tidal tail on the opposite side.companionnear side: pulled harderfar side: pulled lessbridgetidal tailIt is not the attraction that deforms but its difference — the tidal force falls off as 1/r³
Two tidal bulges, galaxy-sized: the stars of the near side are drawn towards the partner, those of the far side lag behind — seen from the disk, both strive outward. The rotation of the disk then winds the extracted stars into the sweeping tails familiar from the Antennae or the Mice galaxies.

Why they do not simply miss each other

Two point masses passing each other continue on their orbits — nothing would ever bring them together. But galaxies are extended, and that changes everything. When a galaxy moves through the halo of another it deflects its dark matter and stars and leaves behind a wake of enhanced density that pulls it back and slows it. This dynamical friction costs orbital energy: a wide fly-by becomes a bound orbit, the bound orbit an ever tighter spiral — until the nuclei merge. For partners of roughly equal mass that takes one to two billion years and a few orbits; a small companion can circle its host for many billions of years before it is absorbed. Whether an encounter binds at all depends on the relative velocity: in loose groups like our Local Group, where galaxies meet at one to two hundred kilometres per second, mergers are common. In rich galaxy clusters with velocities above a thousand kilometres per second the members mostly race past one another — the encounter deforms, but it does not bind.

The stages of a merger

A merger of two galaxies of similar mass — a major merger, by convention from a mass ratio of about one to four — follows a recognisable pattern in simulations and observations:

Five stages of a merger of two spiral galaxies: approach with two intact disks; first passage with bridge and tidal tails; return with strongly distorted disks; merger of the nuclei with a burst of star formation; finally a quiet elliptical system with faint shells. The process takes about one to three billion years.approachtwo intact diskshalos already overlap0first passagebridge and tailsgas flows inward≈ 0.5 billion yearsreturnorbit shrinksdisks destroyed≈ 1 billioncoalescencenuclei unitestarburst, active nucleus≈ 1–2 billionrestelliptical galaxyshells, little gas≈ 3 billion years
The “Toomre sequence” as a schematic. The times are orders of magnitude from simulations; real encounters differ with orbit, mass ratio and gas content. A minor merger — a small companion being swallowed — usually leaves the disk of the host galaxy intact and merely thickens it.

For gas-poor partners the end result is an elliptical galaxy: the ordered rotation of the two disks has been converted into disordered motion, the stars move every which way, the shape is an ellipsoid. This is the main formation channel of the giant ellipticals that populate the centres of galaxy clusters. Their origin often remains visible for a long time — as faint shells and arcs in the outer light, the remnants of the tails that have fallen back. For gas-rich partners, by contrast, a new small disk can form from the returning gas. So the old rule “spirals merge into ellipticals” holds, but with exceptions.

Stars miss, gas collides

In a galaxy collision practically no stars collide. In the solar neighbourhood about four light-years separate two stars — that is some tens of millions of solar diameters. Two galaxies therefore pass through each other like two swarms of gnats; the stars feel only the combined gravitational field, which redirects their orbits. Gas is a different matter: gas clouds are extended and really do collide. They form shock fronts, lose energy, condense and fall to the centre. The result can be a starburst, in which a hundred times as many stars form in a short time as in a quiet disk. The most luminous infrared galaxies in the universe are almost all merging systems whose dust swallows the light of billions of young stars and re-emits it as heat. But a starburst is not an inevitable consequence: it needs gas that is still there and an orbit that drives it to the centre. In the Antennae galaxies NGC 4038/4039 both are the case — their overlap region is among the most productive star factories in the nearby universe. NASA: The Antennae galaxies

AI-generated illustration of a galaxy encounter: two distinguishable nuclei, distorted disks and long tidal tails visualise the effect of gravity. Not a photograph of a specific pair and no prediction for the Milky Way and Andromeda. **This image is AI-generated** — not a photograph but a visualisation.

AI-generated illustration of a galaxy encounter: two distinguishable nuclei, distorted disks and long tidal tails visualise the effect of gravity. Not a photograph of a specific pair and no prediction for the Milky Way and Andromeda. This image is AI-generated — not a photograph but a visualisation.

Traces of past encounters

Encounters leave scars that can still be read after billions of years. The Milky Way carries several: the stellar stream of the Sagittarius dwarf galaxy, wrapping itself around the whole Galaxy right now; the remains of Gaia-Enceladus in the halo, a galaxy absorbed about ten billion years ago that probably heated the Milky Way's thick disk; and the Magellanic Stream, a band of gas the two Magellanic Clouds trail behind them. M 31, too, is no untouched system. Around it lies a giant stellar stream from a torn-apart companion, and its outskirts are full of shells and arcs. A 2018 study interprets the compact companion M 32 as the surviving core of a once large galaxy that M 31 plundered down to this remnant about two billion years ago — an interpretation that fits the stellar streams, though not the only possible one. For the images this means: the smooth appearance of M 31 hides an eventful history that is simply too faint to see in broadband light. Ibata et al. (2001): The stellar stream around M 31; D'Souza & Bell (2018): M 32 as a remnant

Andromeda: an open ending

M 31 approaches the Milky Way at about 110 kilometres per second, and for a long time a merger in four to five billion years was considered settled. The flaw in that reckoning was the transverse motion: whether two galaxies collide head-on or circle each other is decided by the sideways velocity, and at a distance of 2.5 million light-years that can only be measured with great uncertainty. A study published in 2025 computed the orbit many thousands of times, taking all measurement uncertainties into account — including the perturbations by M 33 and the Large Magellanic Cloud, both of which noticeably alter the orbit. The result: in about half the cases the Milky Way and Andromeda merge within the next ten billion years, in the other half they do not; a merger as early as four to five billion years from now is unlikely, at only a few percent. Should it happen, the outcome would be a single elliptical galaxy, half in jest called “Milkomeda” — and the Sun, by then a red giant itself, would most probably survive the event unharmed on a new orbit. Sawala et al. (2025): No certainty of a Milky Way–Andromeda collision

What one may claim from one's own image

Our Andromeda photograph shows companions and structure, but no future orbit. The small galaxies next to NGC 891 and the “companions” of NGC 7331 are not shown to be partners by their proximity in the image — in the case of NGC 7331 they demonstrably lie about an order of magnitude further away. Interpreting a pair as interacting requires distances, velocities and morphological evidence: bridges, tails, warped disks. An inconspicuous patch of light may remain intriguing without being credited with an unproven encounter. What a photograph can do, however, is show the companions that really are bound — M 32 and M 110 at Andromeda — and hint that things must once have been rougher there.

A few things worth knowing:

  • There used to be more collision. In the young universe galaxies stood closer together and merged far more often. A large part of today's galaxy mass came together this way; the quiet present is the exception, not the rule.
  • Minor mergers are routine. The Milky Way has absorbed dozens of dwarf galaxies and remained a spiral throughout. Only a major merger destroys the disk.
  • Ring galaxies are bull's-eyes. When a small galaxy plunges centrally through a disk, a density wave runs outward and ignites a ring of star formation — the Cartwheel Galaxy is the most famous example.
  • Cluster giants feed. The central giant galaxies of large clusters have grown by continually consuming smaller members — “galactic cannibalism” is a serious technical term.
  • Black holes merge too. When two galaxies with central black holes come together, the holes sink to the common centre and eventually unite. The gravitational-wave background of such events has been emerging in the timing of pulsars since 2023.

In my own sky

Real companions, real scars — and apparent neighbours that are not:

M31 — our neighbor galaxy, its two companions, and a ring of glowing hydrogen23 objects — show
M 31 with companions: the present arrangement of a system that has already swallowed several smaller galaxies. The giant stellar stream and the shells in the outskirts are far too faint for this image. No proof of a certain future collision with the Milky Way.My photograph · M 31 · view gallery entry
M32 — the most compact galaxy in the neighborhood1 object — show
M 32, compact to the point of absurdity: a lot of mass in a tiny space. The prevailing interpretation sees in it the core of a galaxy stripped of its envelope by M 31 in a close encounter — tides as sculptor, one size up from the nebulae.My photograph · M 31 · 18.8′ × 19.2′ · view gallery entry
NGC 205 (M110) — a dwarf elliptical with dust it ought not to have1 object — show
M 110, the second bright companion: a dwarf elliptical gravitationally bound to M 31 and slowly eroded by its tides. Unlike the background galaxies in the other fields, membership here is certain.My photograph · M 31 · 33.3′ × 25.4′ · view gallery entry
Apparent companions – galaxies far beyond3 objects — show
The “Deer Lick Group” at NGC 7331: NGC 7335, 7336 and 7337 look like companions but lie about an order of magnitude further away. No encounter, just a shared line of sight — the group name describes the sky, not space.My photograph · NGC 7331 · 8.2′ × 4.2′ · view gallery entry
Galaxies behind the star field5 objects — show
The field of NGC 891 contains more distant galaxies such as NGC 906 and NGC 909. Angular separation is not spatial distance: they belong to the cluster Abell 347, about eight times further out than NGC 891 itself.My photograph · NGC 891 · 21.7′ × 12.8′ · view gallery entry

Further reading

← All articles